Forensic officers stopped counting manually after reaching 75,000 indecent images of children on Louis Rumis's devices. The 82-year-old from Everton, UK, admitted to possessing the collection, which included Category A material — the most severe classification — featuring infants. The full total was never confirmed because the volume was simply too large to finish tallying.

When his case reached sentencing, the judge did not hesitate to name what Rumis had done. "If it wasn't for people like him, children wouldn't be abused," the judge stated from the bench. Despite those words, Rumis walked out of court the same day. His age — 82 — was cited as the only factor preventing a long-term custodial sentence. His sentence was suspended.

A First Raid That Changed Nothing

Police first raided Rumis's home in April 2024. Officers seized devices and opened an investigation. What happened next is the detail that defined the case: Rumis continued accessing illegal content after that first raid. A second police visit in May 2025 confirmed it. In the 13 months between the two raids, he had not stopped.

That gap — a full year of continued offending after law enforcement had already knocked on his door — did not result in a prison term. The court was aware of it. The suspended sentence was handed down regardless.

What Supervision Looks Like Now

Rumis was placed under a Sexual Harm Prevention Order, which carries strict conditions designed to limit his access to children and digital devices. Specialist officers are expected to conduct frequent, unannounced visits to his home to check for any hidden devices. His name has been added to the Sex Offenders Register with no end date — he will remain on it for the rest of his life.

The Everton community where he lives was not given much detail about those conditions at the time of sentencing. Local concern about the suspended sentence was immediate and direct.

How This Case Compares

Age has not always shielded older offenders from prison in similar UK cases. A 75-year-old man was jailed for over two years after being found with nearly 70,000 indecent images of children, some of which he had uploaded online. An 80-year-old was sentenced to 16 years for contact offences against seven children. Both cases involved defendants whose ages were comparable to Rumis at the time of sentencing.

In Rumis's case, the judge drew a direct line between possession and harm — and then drew a suspended sentence. He remains at home in Everton, under supervision, with no release date because there was no prison term to release him from.